No 78.
Commercial.
Sir,
251
28820
Rez0900 08
July 22nd 1908.
20998
With reference to your telegram No I of this Series of yesterday's date and my despatch No 73 Commercial, Confidential, of the 13th instant concerning the rejection of Chinese immigrants at Salina Cruz, I have the honour to state that Dr Valenzuela, whose departure for Hong Kong I reported in my Despatch No 65 Commercial of July 5th 1907, returned to Mexico some time back and appears to have been appointed Health Officer of the Port of Salina Cruz.
I was not aware that he was the same person as the Doctor Valenzuela who had left for Hong Kong, or would have reported it.
As I remarked in my Despatch No 73, Confidential, Dr Valenzuela and the China Commercial Steamship Company in Hong Kong had differences of opinion, and these seem to have prejudiced the Doctor against the Company.
As far...
however,
The Right Honble Sir Edward Grey Bart. M.P.
etc.
etc.
etc.
No 78.
mercial.
Sir,
251
28820
Rez0900 08
July 22nd 1908.
20998
With reference to your telegram No I of this Se-
ries of poskerday's date and my rospatch o 73 Commercial,
Confidential, of the 13th instant concernin: the rejection
of Chinese immigrants at Salina cruz, I have the honour to
state that Dr Valenzuela, whoco departura for Hong Kong I
reported in ry Despatch Mo 65 Commerciul of July 5th 1907,
returned to Mexico some time back and appears to have bean
at unco appointed Health Officer of the Port of Salina Cruz,
I was not aware that he was the mimo porsen as the Doctor
Valenzuola who had left for tong Kong, or would have repor-
ted it.
As I remarked in my Wuspatch No 73, Confidential,
Dr Valenzuela and the China Commercial. Steinslip company in
Hong Kong had differences of opinion, and these scem te
have prejudlead the Doctor against the Company.
As far,
however,
he Right Honble
Sir Edward Grey Bert. M.P.
etc.
etc.
etc.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.